Original Research Articles

Computational Modeling of Electromagnetic Fields in Smart Magnetic Devices and Sensor Technologies

Ethan J. Walker

Received 13 Jul 2026, Published online: 30 Jun 2026

Published in Volume 6, Issue 1, 2026, pages 17-20

Open access

Abstract

Computational electromagnetic modeling has become an essential component in the design, optimization, calibration, and performance evaluation of smart magnetic devices and sensor technologies. Modern magnetic systems frequently contain nonlinear ferromagnetic materials, permanent magnets, conducting regions, miniature coils, magnetostrictive layers, piezoelectric components, and semiconductor sensing elements. Their behaviour is governed by strongly coupled electromagnetic, mechanical, thermal, and electronic phenomena that are difficult to describe through analytical equations alone. Numerical approaches such as the finite-element method, finite-difference time-domain method, boundary-element method, method of moments, and micromagnetic simulation enable researchers to calculate field distributions, magnetic forces, induced currents, energy losses, resonance behaviour, sensor sensitivity, and cross-axis interference before physical fabrication. This review examines the mathematical foundations, computational techniques, multiphysics coupling strategies, and engineering applications of electromagnetic-field modeling in smart magnetic devices. Particular attention is given to Hall-effect sensors, magnetoresistive sensors, magnetoelectric devices, fluxgate sensors, inductive sensors, microelectromechanical systems, magnetic actuators, and nanoscale spintronic components. The importance of geometry construction, material characterization, boundary conditions, mesh convergence, solver selection, model-order reduction, parameter optimization, and experimental validation is discussed. Emerging approaches involving digital twins, machine learning, physics-informed neural networks, uncertainty quantification, and high-performance computing are also evaluated. Computational models can significantly reduce prototype cycles and support device miniaturization, but their reliability depends on accurate material data, realistic operating conditions, systematic convergence analysis, and comparison with experimental measurements. Future smart magnetic systems will increasingly rely on hybrid physics-based and data-driven models capable of real-time prediction, adaptive calibration, and autonomous design optimization.

Keywords

  • computational electromagnetics
  • finite-element modeling
  • magnetic sensors
  • smart magnetic devices
  • multiphysics simulation
  • micromagnetic

References

  1. [1] Jin, J. M. The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics. 3rd ed. Wiley-IEEE Press, 2014.
  2. [2] Taflove, A., and Hagness, S. C. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. 3rd ed. Artech House, 2005.
  3. [3] Harrington, R. F. Field Computation by Moment Methods. Macmillan, 1968.
  4. [4] Bíró, O., and Preis, K. “On the Use of the Magnetic Vector Potential in the Finite-Element Analysis of Three-Dimensional Eddy Currents.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 25(4), 3145–3159, 1989.
  5. [5] Donahue, M. J., and Porter, D. G. OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.0. NISTIR 6376, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999.
  6. [6] Brown, W. F. Micromagnetics. Interscience Publishers, 1963.
  7. [7] Nguyen, T. T., Bouillault, F., Daniel, L., and Mininger, X. “Finite Element Modeling of Magnetic Field Sensors Based on Nonlinear Magnetoelectric Effect.” Journal of Applied Physics, 109, 084904, 2011. doi:10.1063/1.3553855.
  8. [8] Gibbs, R., Moreton, G., Meydan, T., and Williams, P. “Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications.” Sensors, 18(4), 931, 2018. doi:10.3390/s18040931.
  9. [9] Chowdhury, A., and Sarjaš, A. “Finite Element Modelling of a Field-Sensed Magnetic Suspended System for Accurate Proximity Measurement Based on a Sensor Fusion Algorithm with Unscented Kalman Filter.” Sensors, 16(9), 1504, 2016. doi:10.3390/s16091504.
  10. [10] Teng, D., and Li, Y. “Finite Element Solutions for Magnetic Field Problems in Terfenol-D Transducers.” Sensors, 20(10), 2808, 2020. doi:10.3390/s20102808.
  11. [11] Lyu, H., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Xiong, X., Liu, Z., and Zou, X. “Modeling and Parameter Sensitivity Improvement in ΔE-Effect Magnetic Sensor Based on Mode Localization Effect.” Micromachines, 13(5), 674, 2022. doi:10.3390/mi13050674.
  12. [12] Beltrán-Pulido, A., Bilionis, I., and Aliprantis, D. “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Parametric Magnetostatic Problems.” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 37(4), 2678–2689, 2022. doi:10.1109/TEC.2022.3180295.
  13. Qazi, M. A., & Sohail, N. (2026). Factors influencing the intention to engage in socially responsible investing. Journal of Economic Innovation and Development, 1(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.65072/jeid.v1i1.3
  14. Mousumi, A., & Sohail, N. (2026). Service quality, engagement, and loyalty in Malaysian telecom. International Journal of Business and Social Science Studies, 6(1). https://ijbsss.com/index.php/IJBSSS/index
  15. Singh, H. S. J., & Sohail, N. (2026). Medical negligence in Malaysian hospitals: A qualitative thematic analysis of organisational and governance failures. Journal of Innovation and Research in Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.66857/jirt.v3i2.38
  16. Asad, M. M., & Sohail, N. (2026a). The influence of vlog marketing on consumer purchase decision-making in Malaysia: The mediating role of consumer engagement. Global Media and Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(2).
  17. Asad, M. M., & Sohail, N. (2026b). Vlog marketing and customer decision-making: A review of the mediating roles of customer engagement and brand perception in the Malaysian context. An integrative literature review and conceptual framework. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management, 3(1).

Metrics

Article views
77
Downloads
23

Licensing

© 2026 Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications. This article is published under CC BY 4.0.

How to cite

Ethan J. Walker , E. J. W. (2026). Computational Modeling of Electromagnetic Fields in Smart Magnetic Devices and Sensor Technologies. Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications, 6(1), 17-20.

How to Cite

Computational Modeling of Electromagnetic Fields in Smart Magnetic Devices and Sensor Technologies. (2026). Journal of Magnetism and Its Applications, 6(1), 17-20. https://jourmag.org/index.php/jma/article/view/148